GOP Candidates :

Listen!

Visit our sister site KnowYourLiberty.com
to study the Constitution and our Founding Documents

Lessons on Constitutional Politics

New video from Constitutional Scholar Steven Pratt!


Help bring the Ron Paul message to those who don't have the Internet!
Go to
www.RonPaulDVD.com

Contact Us

Do you like what we are doing?

Join our team!

Tell a friend!

Contribute articles or information for our site!

Buy some of our signs to get the word out:

Make a donation:

 


 

Rep. Bowers' original letter ...

Communist agenda makes its way to our mainstream

 
Tuesday, January 15th, 2008
By Curtis Bowers

The start of a new year is always a time of reflection as we learn from the past and prepare for the future. An unusual opportunity I had years ago is especially significant today, in light of the many issues facing Americans.

In 1992 I read that the Communist Party USA was gathering at the University of California, Berkeley. I was curious to see what they had to say about the Berlin Wall coming down and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Would they give up, or did they have a different approach? I decided to go and find out.

I assumed it would be a bunch of radical college students, so to fit the part, I grew a goatee, got a revolutionary T-shirt and put on some ratty jeans. After getting checked into my dorm room on campus, I went over to the conference hall for the first meeting. I was amazed to see a room filled with 50-, 60- and 70-year-old men and women, professionally dressed with their briefcases.

For the next several days I listened, took notes and talked to the leadership. The plan they unfolded had nothing to do with guns, bombs or violence. They acknowledged their disappointment with what had happened in the Soviet Union but felt they could still “take America down.” This time, instead of using force from the outside, they would use public policy from the inside.

They had a three part agenda. They would use their manpower, influence and funds to back anything that would destroy our families, businesses and culture.

Firstly, to destroy the family, they would promote co-habitation instead of marriage. They would also try to get children away from their mothers into government programs at the earliest age possible. They felt the best way to do this was to promote the feminist movement, which had been very effective at making women discontent with marriage and motherhood.

Secondly, to destroy businesses, they aimed to wipe out the profit potential that motivated people to start them. If people couldn’t make good money off their ideas and hard work, they would eventually be content working for someone else. They were sure the environmental movement (modest at the time) was the only vehicle capable of creating enough regulation and expense to discourage business growth.

Finally, to destroy our culture, they needed us to abandon our heritage of religion and morality. They believed the homosexual movement, if accepted, would begin to effectively extinguish these values.

At the time they laid out this strategy, I wasn’t overly impressed. It seemed very unrealistic and certainly not something to worry about in my lifetime. Yet as I sit in my office, recall their plan and consider where America is today, I am shocked.

Our first woman presidential candidate talks about how degrading it is to be a stay-at-home mom. Businesses are closing down or moving daily to other countries because environmental regulations are too excessive to make a profit. And legislation is being considered in Washington, D.C. that makes it a crime to discuss in public any opposition to the homosexual lifestyle. As the old advertisement said, “You’ve come a long way, baby!”

When we see many mainstream politicians and activist judges with the same agenda that just 16 years ago was that of Communist strategists, it is time for patriotic Americans to wake up and get involved.

— Curtis Bowers is an Idaho representative from District 10.

 

Rep. Bowers response to the backlash ...

Some readers didn't understand my point

Curtis Bowers
 
Tuesday, January 15th, 2008
I am surprised by some of the responses to my letter of Jan. 9. Some have implied that no such conference was held, and that communists don’t have a continuing agenda. Others have stated I wrote this with great intolerance and full of hate. These readers clearly missed the point.

I was simply sharing an interesting story and observing how successful the communists have been in getting their detailed plan accomplished. While new to me at the time, it turns out this agenda was not new in 1992 when I attended their conference.

In fact, in 1958 (34 years before I attended the event at UC Berkeley), Cleon Skousen published a book titled “The Naked Communist.” Mr. Skousen had been an FBI agent with access to many of the Marxist-Leninist meetings, plans, etc. From this insider information he wrote this best-selling book, wherein he listed 45 of the then “Current Communist Goals” (Page 259 in the Eighth Edition).

Several that are pertinent to my letter are noted below. I hope most responsible readers will conclude I dramatically understated the case.

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture ...

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents ...

The other goals are in Skousen’s book, where readers can study the entire list, see for themselves if the communists have been successful and decide if my brief summary was valid.

Everyone should have a hearing in the marketplace of ideas without fear of name-calling or personal attack

Trying to silence anyone who disagrees by labeling them “hateful” or “intolerant” is a clever way to take away their freedom of speech, but one that should never be used. As long as we have this constitutional right, dialogue and debate of ideas should be encouraged. Letters to the editor are simply a vehicle for doing this.

Any group or individual that tries to label a difference in opinion or woridview as “hateful” should kindly remember this isn’t the Soviet Union yet.

To read the “45-point list,” go to Amazon.com, type in “The Naked Communist” and type in “Current Communist Goals.” I encourage you to read the entire book, which amazingly is still in print. To see a synopsis, from a Marxist point of view, of the Committees of Correspondence Conference I attended, go to www.etext.org/Politics/Essays/cpusa.crisis.

 

 

* This website is neither approved nor funded by any political candidate!

Vital Reading


Which candidates are really Pro-Life?
Why won't Bush SECURE OUR BORDERS?
Can we win an Unconstitutional War?
How the 17th Amendment is destroying our Nation
Mitt Romney's Dark Ages approach to the Constitution!

Gun Control


Illegal Immigration


North American Union
The Proper Role of Government
Global Warming

 

Ron Paul Articles:


Why Does The Establishment Hate
Ron Paul?

Would Reagan vote for Ron Paul?
Ron Paul bears empty pot for Americans
Proud member of the 
Read the Bills Act Coalition